Skip to main content

Five Moral Pieces: Umberto Eco

I bought this on a bag sale (books sold by the bag) at our local library. This book contains essays on War, Religion, Press, Fascism, and Intolerance. The essays are mildly interesting to say the least. I found the essay on Religion least interesting because the discussion was purely centered on Christianity and the conflict between Christianity and Atheism. Needless to say, Umberto is fairly sympathetic to the Christian cause and presents a few interesting arguments.

I also found the essay on War to be a bit simplistic. Umberto is of the opinion that "intellectuals" should always be against war. Since this speech was given in 1991 post cold-war time, and given the end of history narrative that was in the air at that point of time, such a perspective is understandable. I am interested to know if Umberto changed his views given the developments in the past ~30 years. Having grown up in a Hindu school of thought, I think that, there are circumstances where a war can be justified. However, the definition of a just war is far from the conventional warfare that is currently practiced.

The essay on Press gives an interesting historical account of the game changing developments in the news industry and how the print media had adapted to survive. Umberto laments the deterioration of the press from a medium of news to medium of opinion and finally a puppet in the hands of politicians and attention seekers. Umberto did not predict the social media revolution (in his defense, no one did), but the principles behind the deterioration of news media are clearly laid out in this piece. If you want to understand print media, this essay is very informative.

The essay on Fascism and Intolerance are somewhat related, but are discussed differently. I have mixed feelings about the essay on Fascism because, while it talks about the underlying confusion and the heightened threat perception of common people in the early states of Fascism, it doesn't go deeper into the reason for this underlying confusion. The same reasons, i.e., confusion and fear are also provided as reasons for the growth of "intolerance" among common people. I wish Umberto dug a bit deeper and explained the conditions that preceded this supposed intolerance. His symptoms of Ur-Fascism definitely suffer from Doctors Fallacy and read like a horoscope prediction. Any person reading the essay in the context of any country can find two or more commonalities with Ur-Fascism.

Overall, this was a light read and moderately interesting. I am a bit surprised at the timelessness of some of the essays.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Opinion: Aryans, Jews, Brahmins. Theorizing Authority through Myths of Identity

Consider that there are two parties A and B. Party A proposes a "scientific" hypothesis and forces part B to provide an explanation this specific hypothesis. This is exactly the framework for the "Aryan Invasion" myth. Aryan Invasion refers to a hypothesis which briefly states that Aryans were the "white" foreigners who came to India on horse drawn carts and "invaded" the cities of India, driving the original inhabitants, called Dravidians to the south. I call Aryan Invasion as myth neither in a literary philosophical term that folks with English PhD talk about nor as a set of mythological stories that are used in popular culture. I mean myth as something that people literally invented without any scientific basis. The whole "theory" of Aryan Invasion does not have any scientific leg to stand on. Even the religious followers of Aryan Invasion such as Romila Thapar et. al. just switched their stance to Aryan Migration, as if the explana...
2 comments
Read more

The World of Caffine: The Science and Culture of World's Most Popular Drug by Bennett Alan Weinberg and Bonnie K. Bealer

This book was insufferable! Recently, I developed an appetite for specialty coffee and wanted to read more about coffee in general. I bought this book at my local library bag sale (if you ever get a chance, you should do it, it is a good place to buy lots of books) because I got it for cheap. When I finished my previous fiction book, I wanted to read something different (non-fiction), so I picked up this book. Boy! was I disappointed. First, I think the authors should hire an editor to chop down their work. I think this entire book can be cut by two thirds and it makes for a nice 100 page book. There is a boat load of junk that doesn't add to the narration of the book. One of the most irritating aspects of the book are the quotations. Often, quotations are used to provide a perspective or to emphasize an emotion. The quotations in this book drag on and on without a specific goal or conveying an emotion. The writing is poor. It is not crisp. Many times, I would read 4 pages witho...
Post a Comment
Read more

Book Opinion: Touching My Father's Soul - A Sherpa's Journey to the Top of Everest

Why do we do anything? If the basic needs such as food, water, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and sanitation are met, what is the additional motivation to work? People often cite "fulfillment", or worse, "happiness" as a motivation to work (whatever that means!). Now consider an extreme scenario like climbing Mt. Everest, also dearly called Chomolungma, by the common folk in Nepal and Tibet. Why would you want to climb it? I will give an outline of the the logistics involved in climbing Mt. Everest. An expedition would often take at least 2-3 weeks and easily a month. One needs to diligently plan the times of ascend, set up several base camps, and stock up sufficient food, water, and oxygen. It takes several days to get acclimatized to the high altitude. It is essential to carry sufficient clothing and climbing gear. A climber can face storms, avalanches, and injuries, that can be instantly lethal, frost bite that might cause disfiguring or amputation, or worse, ...
Post a Comment
Read more