Skip to main content

Antifragile: Nicholas Nassim Taleb

Introducing new concepts into public understanding is extremely difficult. A lot of interesting observations about the "middle universe" (phenomenon occurring at a scale that can be observed by humans) have been made already because humans and civilization has been around for millennia. Very rarely does a book introduce an entirely new concept introduced into the public understanding. Even more rare that the concept has been hiding in plain sight all along. Antifragile is one such book. It introduces a fundamentally different way of thinking about systems; from biological, to economic, to educational. It is as if we have discovered a new way to measure a system.

The premise of the book is extremely simple and is summarized in the first sentence: "Wind extinguishes a candle and energizes fire." Design a system that embraces volatility "Be the fire and wish for the wind." If minor variations in environment are harmful, then the system is fragile, if they are beneficial, they are antifragile. Candle is fragile, fire is antifragile. The existing words for describing systems such as robust and adaptive only describe the amount of performance degradation as a result of volatility (minimal or no loss of performance). For some reason, until this book was written, the phenomenon that a system can indeed benefit from volatility was very alien. This book lays out a compelling argument that such systems do exist, provides numerous examples of such systems, and provides a blue print for building such a system. He demonstrates how antifragility has helped us in medicine, finance, science, art, food, entertainment, and what not!

The message of the book can be summarized in one statement: protect yourself from fragility. This is done in a very intelligent way. You need not have an accurate predictive knowledge about the system as long as you know how to act. This knowledge of acting in various situations, and more importantly, the option to exercise this choice of action, in Taleb's opinion, more important the prediction about the system itself. Taleb calls it optionality and rule of thumb heuristics. This book also has a hidden and very deep insight about time, which is, time breaks fragile things. I am reminded of a Sanskrit saying.

kālaḥ pachati bhūtāni, kālaḥ saṃharate prajāḥ |
kālaḥ supteṣhu jāgarti, kālo hi duratikramaḥ ||

The writing is very colorful. Taleb does not pull his punches and openly mocks people who are benefited by fragility. Terms like fragilistas, IANDs (International Associations of Name Droppers), Stiglitz syndrome, lecturing birds how to fly, horizontal friend, Fat Tony, etc., are funny, and even more so in the context. Whenever Taleb takes a position opposing someone, he names them, and gives a reason as to why are they full of shit. What I respect about Taleb is that he does not comment on things that he does not know or fully understand. For a book that introduces a fundamentally new concept, this book is very "non-technical". 

Are there things that I do not like in this book? Yes. Would I change some aspects of it? Sure. Is the language at some places childish? Undoubtedly. Can I spill a bottle of ink on the barbaric outcomes that are a consequence of making systems antifragile? You bet! Irrespective of all of them, I would recommend everyone to read this book, you will understand a new and fundamental property of systems, and as a bonus, the book is entertaining (in a YA kinda way!).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Opinion: Aryans, Jews, Brahmins. Theorizing Authority through Myths of Identity

Consider that there are two parties A and B. Party A proposes a "scientific" hypothesis and forces part B to provide an explanation this specific hypothesis. This is exactly the framework for the "Aryan Invasion" myth. Aryan Invasion refers to a hypothesis which briefly states that Aryans were the "white" foreigners who came to India on horse drawn carts and "invaded" the cities of India, driving the original inhabitants, called Dravidians to the south. I call Aryan Invasion as myth neither in a literary philosophical term that folks with English PhD talk about nor as a set of mythological stories that are used in popular culture. I mean myth as something that people literally invented without any scientific basis. The whole "theory" of Aryan Invasion does not have any scientific leg to stand on. Even the religious followers of Aryan Invasion such as Romila Thapar et. al. just switched their stance to Aryan Migration, as if the explana...

Book Opinion: is Indian Civilization a myth?

I picked up this book on a random stroll through the library. I found the title interesting and the cover pretty good, so I thought of giving it a try. This book is basically a collection of essays written on different topics. Some are directly related to the title like "Is Indian Civilization a Myth" and "How India met Vasco", others weren't related at all, like "Marquez, Hemmingway, and Cult of Power" or " An Ambiguous Parisian". Seems like a random collection of essays in no particular order. I found his essay "What, Exactly, is an Empire?" a bit pedantic. It is a classic case of logic defeating its own purpose. Here is the thing, irrespective of any definition of Empire, you are bound to ignore or include some elements that are questionable according to other definitions of Empire. One should not dismiss works on analyzing Empires because they adopted a specific definition. More frustratingly, Sanjay does not even provide an ...

The Gene: An Intimate History by Siddhartha Mukherjee

This book covers the history of genes, right from the age old theories of heredity to the most recent developments on gene editing with CRISPR/cas9. Interleaved with this history are some personal stories about the author's family members who suffer from Schizophrenia. The book is divided into 5 parts based on the chronological and scientific themes. I would consider this book more as a textbook written in an accessible way than a non-fiction book. I certainly learned a lot about the various scientific developments in genetics and contributions of a bunch of Nobel Laureates and also people like Oswald Avery and Rosalind Franklin who were fully deserving of a Nobel. When someone mentions that DNA has a double helix structure and is coiled within chromosomes, I always wondered, how do they know that? This book lays out a sequence of experiments which demonstrates that 1) Chromosomes are carriers of genetic information, 2) Using bio-chemistry, one can know the underlying chemica...