Skip to main content

Civilization - The West and the Rest by Niall Fergueson

Whenever a country or a civilization faces a crisis, several intellectuals come out of the woodwork to (a) remind people of why the country or civilization is great, and (b) put it in the context of challenges that other countries and civilizations have faced. When the world was facing the consequences of sub-prime crisis that started in America, Niall took it upon himself to distill the crux of what does it mean to be called the West and why did it do better than other Civilizations. The goal of this book is to act as a warning sign and perform some self aggrandizing praise (if any). There was a sudden interest in the fall of Rome the year after Trump got elected to presidency. I am sure there will be several books on pandemics, vaccines, and economic crisis after this Covid situation. In this case, Niall preaches the modern gospel of "apps" and similar to old testament, he lists 6 virtues West has. They are 1) Competition, 2) Science, 3) Property, 4) Medicine, 5) Consumption, and 6) Work Ethic.

As an outsider, this book contains two levels of information. First, it provides me with the basic information of some important historic events (that too because I am not well read in History, in 10 years, I reckon I would find all the information to be very repetitive). Second, it provides me with an outsider perspective of non-Western Civilisations like Indian and Chinese. The elements that are present in West that are still absent from East are useful data points to understand the difference in trajectories of civilizations.

Having said that, there are only 2 chapters in the book, namely, Science and Property that I found to be impressive analysis. The chapters on Competition, Medicine, Consumption, and Work were really shoddy. Sure, they all have some element of truth to them, but I think they were blown out of proportion. One of the defining features of past 500 years of European project is imperialism. Ignoring the boost given by imperialism in all these 6 killer apps is, in my opinion, unforgivable. The chapters on Science explained in very simple terms the network effects of scientific collaboration. One thing that I felt Niall completely omitted is that performing any Science requires the country to have surplus and development of robust Chemical Engineering. Where did the West get its surplus from? I reckon it was from the exploitation and pillaging of the South Americas. Indeed, while all of the scientific revolution was going on, England did not have colonies in India.

The chapter on Property was very insightful. I think Niall really missed the point for the divergence between North and South Americas. While Spanish imperialism was indeed a contributing factor, I think the fact that most South Americans did not own land is a major contributing factor. Thomas Sowell explains, in a beautiful way, that unless an individual knows and fully understands that one's history is one's own making, one does not realize one's agency and work towards one's goals. Land ownership is a clear reminder of agency and gives a citizen to participate in the project of self-improvement and nation building. I think this is also the reason why Blacks do not participate actively in the project of America. Overall, I would say this was a good book to read in the beginning, but ended very poorly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Opinion: Aryans, Jews, Brahmins. Theorizing Authority through Myths of Identity

Consider that there are two parties A and B. Party A proposes a "scientific" hypothesis and forces part B to provide an explanation this specific hypothesis. This is exactly the framework for the "Aryan Invasion" myth. Aryan Invasion refers to a hypothesis which briefly states that Aryans were the "white" foreigners who came to India on horse drawn carts and "invaded" the cities of India, driving the original inhabitants, called Dravidians to the south. I call Aryan Invasion as myth neither in a literary philosophical term that folks with English PhD talk about nor as a set of mythological stories that are used in popular culture. I mean myth as something that people literally invented without any scientific basis. The whole "theory" of Aryan Invasion does not have any scientific leg to stand on. Even the religious followers of Aryan Invasion such as Romila Thapar et. al. just switched their stance to Aryan Migration, as if the explana...

The World of Caffine: The Science and Culture of World's Most Popular Drug by Bennett Alan Weinberg and Bonnie K. Bealer

This book was insufferable! Recently, I developed an appetite for specialty coffee and wanted to read more about coffee in general. I bought this book at my local library bag sale (if you ever get a chance, you should do it, it is a good place to buy lots of books) because I got it for cheap. When I finished my previous fiction book, I wanted to read something different (non-fiction), so I picked up this book. Boy! was I disappointed. First, I think the authors should hire an editor to chop down their work. I think this entire book can be cut by two thirds and it makes for a nice 100 page book. There is a boat load of junk that doesn't add to the narration of the book. One of the most irritating aspects of the book are the quotations. Often, quotations are used to provide a perspective or to emphasize an emotion. The quotations in this book drag on and on without a specific goal or conveying an emotion. The writing is poor. It is not crisp. Many times, I would read 4 pages witho...

Book Opinion: Touching My Father's Soul - A Sherpa's Journey to the Top of Everest

Why do we do anything? If the basic needs such as food, water, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and sanitation are met, what is the additional motivation to work? People often cite "fulfillment", or worse, "happiness" as a motivation to work (whatever that means!). Now consider an extreme scenario like climbing Mt. Everest, also dearly called Chomolungma, by the common folk in Nepal and Tibet. Why would you want to climb it? I will give an outline of the the logistics involved in climbing Mt. Everest. An expedition would often take at least 2-3 weeks and easily a month. One needs to diligently plan the times of ascend, set up several base camps, and stock up sufficient food, water, and oxygen. It takes several days to get acclimatized to the high altitude. It is essential to carry sufficient clothing and climbing gear. A climber can face storms, avalanches, and injuries, that can be instantly lethal, frost bite that might cause disfiguring or amputation, or worse, ...